Lista Studio srl®
Borgo Belvigo 33, 36016 Thiene Vi ITALY
tel/fax 0445,382056 o email@example.com
Abbott Labs sidesteps trial and error re-engineering
software from Knowledge Revolution.
While virtual prototyping is popularly regarded as the ticket to more
efficient product and design development, many engineers today use the
process to optimize the performance of existing products and equipment.
Through the use of Working Model motion analysis software from Knowledge
Revolution, Abbott Labs is realizing the promise of re-design through
virtual prototyping; making assembly line machinery faster, more reliable
and operator friendly without the expense of building a physical model or
"Creating a simulation allowed us to identify the problem in our
equipment, install a replacement part and have the whole thing functioning
perfectly the first time," says Randy Fergen, an Engineer in Abbott
Abbott Labs is no stranger to innovation.
The health care giant is a leader
in the development of nutritional, pharmaceutical, diagnostic, and hospital
equipment and distributes products from production centers around the world.
But before Abbott adopted a simulation software solution, design problems at
such facilities, whether for new equipment or a retrofit, were rarely solved
so quickly or easily.
"When troubleshooting a critical area on an existing piece of equipment, we
sometimes had to make adjustments or modifications until the machine was
performing reliably in the robust manner which manufacturing equipment
demands," says Fergen.
"In the past, re-design meant a couple
weeks crunching numbers and designing parts, submitting the drawing for
fabrication, then waiting weeks more for the machine shop to turn the
To improve engineering and design practices Fergen and his associates began
searching for a simulation system that would eliminate time and materials waste
without incurring high purchase or maintenance costs.
Knowledge Revolution's Working Model addressed that need perfectly.
Nailing Down the Problem
Recently, Fergen put Working Model to the test in the redesign of a
pick-and-place machine used for assembly of diagnostic products.
Excessive vibration in the machine was responsible for unusually high noise
levels, restricted machine speed, and abnormally frequent service.
As the problem persisted, the company experienced diminished throughput.
Careful observation by Fergen and his team suggested that the vibration was
attributable to a cam operating in the pick-and-place function.
The profile of the cam resulted in a rigid and jarring pattern of motion in which
the substantial and rapidly accelerating mass of the placement mechanism would
come to a violent halt before making each of the four 90 degree motions in its
Fergen deduced that a smoother cam profile with fewer dwells would result in
a more fluid motion; reducing vibration, noise, and the wear associated with a
cycle of high impact mechanical movements.
Aware that the previous cam would
be replaced, Fergen elected to conduct the redesign in Working Model.
He hoped that simulations on screen would reveal precisely which deficiency in
the cam profile was responsible for the vibration and which modifications
would result in more effective operation.
Fergen's initial observations of the machine itself revealed just how
challenging the redesign would be.
"It was obvious that the
original manufacturer didn't fully consider the acceleration profile
and inertia that this cam would generate at higher speeds,"
according to Fergen.
"The original cam design
was very generic without regard to harmonic motion, masses or velocities that
would potentially be involved in this pick-and-place application."
Matters were further complicated by the absence of a timing diagram to illustrate
ideal performance parameters for the cam.
"The motion involved was
very generally defined," says Fergen. "The timing diagram we had
on hand used straight diagonal lines to define the motion profile rather
than a sin wave or curvilinear measurement. We were still searching for a
method to illustrate the symptoms we had observed."
From Raw Data to Real Time
Determining problematic aspects of the cam's properties for graphic analysis
required strict definition of the cam's existing motion profile.
For this process at least, old-world engineering techniques came in handy:
Fergen took caliper measurements of all critical interactive motion activities
at every encoder increment of the machine's cycle and converted the data to
distance displaced per degree of motion.
From that point on, Fergen's analysis took place in the electronic domain.
Caliper readings were placed in a Excel spreadsheet to create a referenceable
timing diagram of the machine's motion. Next, Fergen designed individual
components of the machine in 2D with AutoCAD Release 12 to be transferred as
DXF files to Working Model.
Once separate components were reassembled in Working Model, Fergen imported
data from the Excel timing diagrams through a DDE link to drive the animation.
"The look-up table from Excel became a program telling the
components exactly how to run," Fergen states. "We were working
with very exact data that we had compiled and verified so we were certain
that the properties of the components would be right on."
Before a final display of the animation, Fergen fine tuned the operating
parameters of the simulation; assigning exact mass properties, velocity and
force vectors with corresponding features in Working Model.
we had an exact duplication of the problem we were examining," says Fergen.
"Debugging the existing simulation was just a matter of observation
on the screen and optimizing the motion profile through the timing chart
The flexibility of the simulation environment also enabled Fergen to examine
secondary variables that might not ordinarily merit consideration in a
"We could experiment to see how a change in mass
In this particular instance, mass was a less important
consideration; we might have ignored it entirely, but it's so easy to plug in
new values in Working Model and observe the changes that we were able to do
it without devoting a lot of time to it".
Repairs in the Virtual World
With the faulty profile of the cam plainly illustrated, Fergen set about
a sequence of corrections in the cam profile, all the while observing
possible interferences that would affect functions elsewhere in the machine.
Examining the new timing diagram and simulation he realized that the cam
required only one dwell in the motion profile and that the boxy motion of
the pick-and-place arm could be replaced by a semi-elliptical pattern to reduce
jerk while avoiding interferences. "It made much more sense than a
rigid motion full of right angles and stops, especially when you saw it
functioning in Working Model." states Fergen.
Satisfied that the Working Model simulation revealed a far superior cam profile,
Fergen imported the Working Model file back into AutoCAD to create a detailed
drawing and prepare the file for transfer to CAM software. From there the new
design was sent for fabrication on an in-house CNC machine.
Validation of the virtual prototyping process came immediately after installation
of the new, improved cam, according to Fergen "We received the cam from the
machine shop, installed it and had the machine working better than it ever had.
Using the modifications that were created through the Working Model simulation,
we were able to increase the machine speed by 20 percent while reducing
Large companies like Abbott Labs will likely continue to reap the benefits of
virtual prototyping and simulation as product development teams, engineers,
and maintenance personnel continue to save time and materials. But some benefits
that giants like Abbott are realizing now may mean similar gains for smaller
Because products like Working Model permit more complete
examination of design alternatives, pre-existing or obsolete designs may find
new life in re-engineered form.
Abbott is currently applying this approach.
"We'll be able to take off-the-shelf parts and optimize them for our needs.
We anticipate that we'll be able to increase the speed of other machines by
35 percent by finding an optimum cam profile using Working Model."
Fergen is impressed with the design possibilities that are afforded by
compatible software that can collect performance data, create objects with
real world properties, and accurately simulate their functions.
"If you were just generating data in Excel, for instance, you wouldn't
get very far in understanding a problem, just a lot of charts, but by simulating
an event for which a spreadsheet or CAD software provide the parameters,
you create a means of feedback.
That kind of engineering information is